Tag Archive for: scandal

Politics As Usual Or Is Scandal A Thing Of The Past?

Teapot Dome 
By Cathy Perkins
This day in history – “Teapot Dome” became synonymous with outrage, political scandal and a disgraceful event.

You remember history, that thing we’re destined to repeat if we don’t remember it? 

What happened, you ask?

https://millercenter.org/sites/default/files/%5Bdate%3Acustom%3AY%5D-%5Bdate%3Acustom%3Am%5D/Teapot_Rock_postcard.jpg
Teapot Dome
In 1920,  Warren G. Harding, a senator and  Ohio newspaper publisher, won a long-shot bid for the White House with the financial backing of oilmen who were promised oil-friendly cabinet picks in return.

Harding’s campaign slogan for the election was “Return to normalcy,” a return to the way of life before World War I. His promise was to return the United States to its prewar greatness after the hardships of World War I (1914-1918). (Hmm,
Make America Great?) As president, Harding favored pro-business policies, diminished conservation, and
limited immigration. 

Even though it lasted only from 1921 to 1923 (Harding died in 1923), Harding’s administration became the
most scandal-ridden to date, thanks to his political friends. Attorney General
Harry Daugherty was accused of profiting from the sale of government alcohol
supplies during Prohibition, as well as selling pardons. Harding’s head of the
Veterans Bureau, Charles Forbes, was sentenced to two years in prison for
bribery and corruption. Other scandals involved appointees in the Shipping
Bureau and Alien Property Custodians office. And, Harding’s Secretary of the
Interior, Albert B. Fall, announced his resignation in the midst of an
unfolding scandal that would become known as Teapot Dome.

Now I’d heard of the Teapot Dome scandal, but didn’t really know what was involved, so on a whim, I did a
little research. (It’s what authors do, usually when they’re procrastinating.)

The Teapot Dome Scandal of the 1920s shocked Americans by revealing an unprecedented level of greed and
corruption within the federal government. The scandal involved ornery oil
tycoons, poker-playing politicians, illegal liquor sales, a murder-suicide, a
womanizing president and a bagful of bribery cash.

https://millercenter.org/sites/default/files/%5Bdate%3Acustom%3AY%5D-%5Bdate%3Acustom%3Am%5D/AlbertFall_0.jpg
Albert Fall

During the Teapot Dome scandal, Albert B. Fall was found guilty of accepting a bribe while in office. (Fall claimed it was a loan from Doheny worth about $5 million in today’s dollars. He was unable to justify the ~$15 million in cash and bonds he received from Sinclair. Some sources say it was “only” $10 million.) Fall was the first individual to be convicted of a crime committed while a presidential cabinet member.

Fall attempted to transfer control of the Forest Service from the Department of Agriculture. He wanted the natural resources of the Alaska Territory (apparently for his own use), but was no match for the Agriculture Secretary–and future Vice President–Henry Wallace. He was more “successful” with the US Naval oil-reserves. As the Navy converted from coal-powered to oil-fueled ships, the reserves insured there was sufficient oil in the event of another war.

Fall convinced Warren G. Harding to transfer supervision of the land from the Navy to the Department of
the Interior in May 1921 (which Harding did by Executive Order). Fall then secretly
granted exclusive rights to the Teapot Dome(Wyoming) reserves to Harry F. Sinclair of the Mammoth Oil Company (April 7, 1922). (He also made similar rights grants to Edward L. Doheny of Pan American Petroleum Company for the Elk Hills and Buena Vista Hills reserves in California (1921–22).)

What brought Fall down was a Congress that actually investigated instead of staging
political shows and a Justice Department that “followed the money.” Fall’s
personal financial position improved dramatically following the lease grants,
attracting the attention of Senate investigators. Special prosecutors were
appointed and the investigation unraveled the crime.

In 1929, Fall became the first former Cabinet officer ever convicted of a felony committed while in
office. He was fined $100,000, which he never paid, and served only nine months
of a one-year prison sentence. “My version of the matter is simply that I
was not guilty,” he told the parole board. (Ironically enough, after
resigning, Fall took part in lucrative oil deals in Russia and Mexico with both Doheny and Sinclair.)

Doherty was never charged, but Sinclair refused to answer some of the Senate team’s questions, claiming that Congress had no right to probe his private affairs. That refusal was challenged and eventually reached
the Supreme Court. In the 1929, Sinclair vs. United States ruling,
the court said that Congress did have the power to fully investigate cases
where the country’s laws may have been violated. Sinclair would later serve six
months in prison for contempt of Congress and jury tampering.





An award-winning author of financial mysteries, Cathy Perkins writes twisting dark suspense and light amateur sleuth stories.  When not writing, she battles with the beavers over the pond height or heads out on another travel adventure. She lives in Washington with her husband, children, several dogs and the resident deer herd. 

Visit her at http://cperkinswrites.com or on Facebook

Sign up for her new release announcement newsletter in either place. 

She’s hard at work on the next book in the Holly Price series,  In It For The Money which releases this summer.

Untitled Post

Clicking Our Heels – Should Sex, Politics, and Scandals be dramatized
or even factually incorporated into our writing?

Cathy Perkins – A craft book I’m studying discusses the importance
of incorporating what you’re passionate about into your stories to bring them
to life and serve as a driving force. If you’re excited by an issue or topic,
that intensity will transfer to the page. Family, for example, is always
central to my stories, although it may not always be a traditional family. Other
issues which are important to me – and to my readers – bring depth and focus. The
challenge is adding tose elements without preaching and instead making them a
natural part of your character’s reality.

Kimberly Jayne – I think anything is game. We write about all aspects
of life anyway, including imaginary aspects. So yes, sex, politics, and
scandals can be part of my writing. There’s a market out there for readers of
everything, so if I’m interested in a controversial topic or if that topic
would enhance or elevate my story, then I’ll use it and put my spin on it. As
long as readers enjoy the concepts within the stories, controversial or not,
then it’s all good.

Sparkle Abbey – Our books are very much escape reading. We have no
problem at all with books that incorporate real life politics or scandals but
you probably will never find that in a Sparkle Abbey book. We get emails from
readers who share that they’ve read our books while going through difficult
times, (sitting at the bedside of a loved one, after a particularly tough day
at work, or simply as a get-away when they couldn’t actually get away) and this
trills us. There is nothing better than hearing that your work brightened
someone’s day!

Bethany Maines – Yes. A book with no sex, politics, or scandals
would be pretty dang boring. I write fiction, so I don’t think those elements
have to be 100% factual, but I do think they need to be present in someway.

Linda Rodriguez – I believe quite firmly in dealing with the issues
of the day in the society about which I’m writing, whether I’m writing poetry,
mystery, literary fiction, or fantasy. Writing that doesn’t deal in some way
with these issues seems to be to be unrooted and simply lying shallowly on the
surface of things, but I’m aware that other viewpoints on that matter are
equally valid.

Debra H. Goldstein – Even if a book is meant to be fun, social
issues can be incorporated in a manner that don’t hit people over the head.
Ignoring the truth of sex, politics and scandals potentially leaves a dimension
out of one’s writing.

Jennae Phillippe – Sure. I personally think that all writing is
political in some way because it is asking us to relate to the ideas and theme
presented. Some writing is more political than others, either by design or
because it captured something the public wanted to politicize. But these things
are a part of real life. However fantastical the tale, it will have elements of
all of them.

Paula Gail Benson – I love how Law
and Order
has taken a current news story and given it a different spin by
considering other ramifications. I think it’s a matter that needs to be
approached carefully and with dignity, both in dramas and parodies or comedy
sketches.

Kay Kendall – I have seen successful books incorporate all three of
those elements – sex, politics, scandals. If other writers can do it well and
you think you can too, then why not? In my first two published mysteries, I use
the politics of the late 1960s as the milieu against which my amateur sleuth
operates. I used the anti-war movement and second stage feminism for,
respectively, Desolation Row and Rainy Day Women. Those were dramatic
ties and as such they lend themselves to heightened feelings—even murderous
ones.

The Word Thief

by Susan McBride

I’ve been reading with interest information regarding the latest case of plagiarism in the literary world.  A novelist named Quentin Rowan writing as Q.R. Markham has admitted to stealing passages from various novels in order to compose Assassin of Secrets, a modern day James Bond-type book published recently by Little, Brown & Company.

Once caught, Quentin wrote a letter to one of the authors whose words he stole, trying to explain. Here’s a bit from his email to spy novelist Jeremy Duns, rationalizing away (or is that irrationalizing?):

“Once the book was bought, I had to make major changes in quite a hurry, basically re-write the whole thing from scratch, and that’s when things really got out of hand for me. I just didn’t feel capable of writing the kinds of scenes and situations that were asked of me in the time allotted and rather than saying I couldn’t do it, or wasn’t capable, I started stealing again. I didn’t want to be seen as anything other than a writing machine, I guess. Some call it ‘people pleasing.’ Anyway, the more I did it, the deeper into denial I went, until it felt as if I had two brains at war with each other.”

A tiny piece of me feels sorry for the guy.  Having been under the deadline gun dozens of times myself, I understand the sense of pressure.  But to resort to plagiarizing?  Honestly, my only response is WTF???

It isn’t easy writing a book, and it never gets easier.  I have the utmost respect for writers who sit down and compose a draft, accept the editorial letters they in turn receive requesting changes, and sit down again to revise like a madman (or woman).  It’s what we do, and we learn to bite the bullet and get it done because that’s the only way we’re going to write the best damned book we can write.

What a cop out it is to hear someone say, “But revising was too hard!  I couldn’t do it!  I had no choice but to borrow words that other authors slaved over and tweaked and revised.”

Am I crazy, or does it sound even more complicated to plagiarize?  I can’t imagine having to read through book after book, locating specific passages that would fit into the scenes I’m working on, and do that enough times to complete a 300-page manuscript. Yipes. I think I’ll stick to what comes out of my own brain, thank you very much.

I know I sound mean–I’m feeling a little like Simon Cowell here–but the literary world seems to be taking quite a beating lately and I hate seeing another scandal that detracts from all the good stuff going on. My advice for Mr. Rowan: If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the publishing kitchen.

If you can’t write your own books and you can’t conjure up descriptions and narrative and dialogue from your own imagination, please ask for a ghost writer.  Look at the Kardashian sisters, Lauren Conrad, Hilary Duff, that mom and daughter team on “Selling New York,” or Snooki, for Pete’s sake.  They don’t write their own novels either.  Their publisher pays someone else to do it for them.  Someone who (hopefully) doesn’t resort to stealing other authors’ words.